The EU AI Office has published the third draft of its General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, which outlines key copyright obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models. This draft emphasizes the importance of complying with EU copyright laws, particularly regarding the use of training data and the rights of content creators.
Starting from August 2, 2025, providers of General Purpose AI models will face significant obligations under the EU’s AI Act, including the need to provide technical documentation and conduct risk assessments for powerful models. The ongoing drafting of the Code of Practice raises concerns about its procedural legitimacy and the introduction of new requirements that extend beyond the original Act.
This article argues that reducing regulation for large AI providers is not a solution for Europe to catch up with the US and China, as it may only deepen dependencies on US technology. Instead, the EU should leverage its regulatory framework and investment strategy to set global standards for trustworthy AI and achieve tech sovereignty.
Responsible AI refers to the practice of developing and using AI systems in a way that aligns with ethical principles, promotes fairness, avoids bias, ensures transparency, and maintains accountability. As AI systems grow more influential, it is critical to ensure they are designed, developed, and deployed responsibly to avoid potential harm.
The article discusses the EU’s decision to withdraw the AI Liability Directive, which would have established accountability for AI systems that cause harm. This move is seen as a concession to Big Tech, raising concerns about the lack of regulatory oversight and the potential for exploitation in a market dominated by a few large companies.
The article discusses the importance of responsible AI practices as organizations rapidly adopt generative AI tools. It emphasizes the need for ethical governance frameworks and proactive strategies to mitigate risks while enhancing customer trust and operational excellence.
The European Commission is seeking feedback from startups regarding the regulatory challenges they face under the EU’s AI laws, aiming to ease compliance costs and administrative burdens. This initiative is part of the “AI Continent Action Plan,” which emphasizes reducing compliance hurdles for smaller companies.
The European Commission is seeking feedback from startups regarding the regulatory challenges imposed by the EU’s AI laws, particularly focusing on compliance costs and administrative burdens. This initiative aims to simplify rules and reduce potential obstacles for smaller companies as the AI Act approaches its implementation date.
The EU’s newly unveiled AI Continent Action Plan aims to enhance AI leadership and deployment while addressing key enablers like access to computing resources and high-quality data. However, experts warn that without regulatory reforms to remove existing hurdles, the plan may not achieve its full potential.
Singapore is unveiling its National AI Strategy 2.0, aimed at positioning itself as both an AI innovator and regulator while addressing challenges like data privacy and AI bias. As the nation navigates this landscape, the emphasis on accountability and governance becomes crucial in ensuring that AI systems operate responsibly.