Day: April 8, 2025

AI Chatbots: Manipulation, Legal Loopholes, and the Illusion of Care

The subtle yet potentially devastating impact of personified AI chatbots, particularly in therapeutic settings, demands immediate and careful consideration. While existing EU legal frameworks offer fragmented protection, significant loopholes remain, leaving vulnerable users exposed to manipulation and harm. Relying on manufacturers’ disclaimers or narrowly defined medical device classifications proves insufficient. A more holistic and proactive approach is needed, one that acknowledges the unique social dynamic created by these AI companions and prioritizes user safety over unchecked technological advancement. The current system struggles to address the novel risks arising from these relationships, highlighting the urgent need for updated legal and ethical guidelines that reflect the realities of AI’s increasing presence in our lives and minds.

Read More »

The Urgency of Responsible AI Development

With billions of users, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being widely deployed across various fields, raising concerns about its responsible use. Companies must ensure that the benefits of AI outweigh the potential harms to society.

Read More »

Impacts of the EU AI Act on UK Businesses

The EU AI Act, effective from August 1, 2024, introduces a risk-based framework for regulating artificial intelligence that UK businesses must understand and comply with to compete in the European market. Non-compliance could lead to significant fines and reputational damage, making it essential for organizations to align their AI systems with the Act’s requirements.

Read More »

Implementing Responsible AI: Bridging Ethics and Action

As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into society, the demand for “responsible AI” has intensified, emphasizing the need for ethical principles like fairness and transparency. This article explores practical methods to implement responsible AI through five critical pillars, including bias mitigation and data governance.

Read More »

AI Sovereignty: Balancing Autonomy and Control

Sovereign AI has become a significant focus for various governments seeking control over artificial intelligence development and deployment within their borders. This paper discusses the goals, definitions, and implications of sovereign AI, emphasizing the necessity of aligning AI initiatives with national laws and cultural values.

Read More »

Google’s AI Features Stalled by EU Regulations

Google’s AI feature, AI Overviews, is currently on hold in most EU countries due to regulatory uncertainties, despite its launch in eight member states. A senior executive expressed concerns that strict EU tech rules hinder product innovation and result in a subpar user experience in Europe.

Read More »

AI Governance: Transparency, Ethics, and Risk Management in the Age of AI

AI is rapidly transforming society, creating both opportunities and risks. A proposed AI governance framework emphasizes transparency, ethical development, and robust risk management. Key commitments include documenting models, complying with copyright law, and establishing safety frameworks. The framework is guided by EU values, the AI Act itself, proportionality to risk, future-proofing, SME support, ecosystem support, and innovation. For high-risk AI, providers must define and implement safety and security frameworks, document risk assessments, and undergo independent evaluations. Continuous monitoring, adaptation, and collaboration are crucial for responsible AI development. Non-retaliation protections for reporting workers is a key component.

Read More »

Global AI Regulation: Challenges and Approaches

As AI continues to transform industries and societies, governments worldwide are struggling to regulate its development and deployment effectively. The report released by Arm highlights the varying approaches to AI governance, emphasizing the need for international cooperation to manage the associated risks while fostering innovation.

Read More »

Virginia’s AI Bill Veto: Implications for State-Level Legislation

On March 24, 2025, Virginia’s Governor Glenn Youngkin vetoed House Bill 2094, which aimed to regulate artificial intelligence in the state. The bill faced significant opposition from industry groups and was seen as potentially burdensome for businesses, particularly in the context of the current pro-innovation stance of the Trump administration.

Read More »