State Rep. Hubert Delany emphasizes the urgent need for AI regulation to ensure fairness, accountability, and transparency in systems that affect people’s lives. He supports Senate Bill 2, which aims to establish human oversight and prevent discrimination in AI decision-making processes.
Governments around the world are struggling to balance the need for regulation with the rapid expansion of AI technology. While the European Union aims to establish a legal framework for AI, the U.S. adopts a more laissez-faire approach to foster innovation.
On February 12, 2025, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation on its draft opinion regarding artificial intelligence (AI) governance and risk management. The Opinion provides guidance for insurance undertakings on the responsible use of AI systems in the insurance value chain, emphasizing the importance of proportionality in governance and risk management measures.
At SXSW 2025, Dr. Rumman Chowdhury emphasized the importance of viewing artificial intelligence through a diverse lens and highlighted the need for responsible AI practices that empower users. She advocates for a shift from passive acceptance of technology to active participation, urging for systems that allow individuals to make informed choices about the algorithms that affect their lives.
The draft Code of Practice on General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) aims to assist AI companies in complying with the EU’s AI Act, focusing on transparency, copyright, and risk assessment. However, the tech industry has raised significant concerns about the draft’s burdensome requirements and its potential impact on innovation.
The GPAI Code of Practice outlines the requirements for compliance with EU copyright law for providers of General-Purpose AI models. The third draft emphasizes proportional compliance based on the provider’s size and capacities, with significant changes to copyright policy measures compared to the previous draft.
Spain’s government has approved a draft bill to regulate the ethical use of artificial intelligence, which includes mandatory labeling of AI-generated content. The bill aims to align national laws with EU regulations and prohibits harmful AI practices such as deepfakes and biometric recognition in public spaces.
The article discusses how AI systems pose new societal harms that threaten judicial independence and the rule of law due to their algorithmic opacity and lack of legal safeguards. It emphasizes the need for robust legal frameworks to address these risks and ensure that democratic processes are not undermined.
Several French publishing associations have filed a joint legal complaint against Meta, alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted materials to train its generative AI, in violation of the EU AI Act. The associations seek to ensure that the creation of an AI market does not harm the cultural sector and advocate for greater protections and compensation for affected creators.
The article discusses the challenges and uncertainties surrounding the United States’ approach to artificial intelligence (AI) governance under President Trump, emphasizing the need to balance rapid innovation with safety and public trust. It highlights the divergence between U.S. AI policies and those of the European Union and China, suggesting that the U.S. should integrate meaningful safeguards to maintain its leadership in AI development.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
