Meta Platforms Inc., Adobe Inc., and over 70 other publicly-traded US companies are warning that the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act poses significant risks to their businesses due to compliance costs and potential legal liabilities. The act’s implementation may force companies to alter their product offerings in the EU while facing aggressive enforcement actions.
This blog post explores the rise of experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes within the context of the EU’s AI Act, emphasizing their potential to foster innovation while safeguarding fundamental rights. It analyzes whether these new legislative approaches can effectively address the challenges posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence technologies.
As state and local legislatures begin to craft their own AI regulations, automated decision making has become a key focus area. Laws in places like Colorado, Illinois, and New York City aim to prevent discrimination in AI systems used for significant consumer decisions.
The Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Bill seeks to introduce AI-specific legislation in the UK, reflecting ongoing concerns about AI governance and regulatory gaps. Its reintroduction highlights the tension between the government’s pro-innovation stance and calls for formal oversight mechanisms amidst evolving global regulatory landscapes.
A California lawmaker has introduced the “No Robo Bosses Act,” aimed at regulating the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace. This legislation seeks to address concerns about AI replacing human jobs and ensuring fair treatment of workers.
The new EU Product Liability Directive 2024/2853, which came into force on December 8, 2024, significantly modernizes product liability rules and explicitly includes software and AI-integrated products. Companies using AI in their products must be aware that they can be held liable for damages caused by software defects, including issues arising from insufficient updates or cybersecurity weaknesses.
The post discusses the importance of responsible artificial intelligence (AI) in software engineering, highlighting both its potential benefits and the ethical challenges it poses. It emphasizes the need for fairness, transparency, and accountability in AI development to mitigate risks and ensure positive societal impact.
The European Union’s AI Act mandates that organizations ensure their workforce is sufficiently AI-literate, requiring tailored training programs for technical teams, non-technical staff, and leadership. This initiative not only aims for compliance but also presents an opportunity to foster a strong security culture and enhance organizational resilience in an AI-driven landscape.
Eight public bodies have been designated as competent authorities to implement and enforce the new EU AI Act in Ireland. This initiative aims to boost economic productivity and enhance public services while ensuring trust in AI systems.
This post discusses the complexities of intellectual property (IP) in the context of AI solutions, emphasizing the need for a tailored due diligence approach. It highlights critical questions regarding ownership, licensing rights, and the assessment of training data to mitigate risks associated with IP infringement.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
