The discussion raises questions about the necessity and effectiveness of the EU AI Act, suggesting that many of its provisions may be redundant or misdirected. Key points from a recent workshop highlight the challenges of defining AI and the potential for innovation to be stifled by overly stringent regulations.
The EU AI Act, enforced since February 2025, introduces a risk-based framework for classifying AI systems and imposes significant penalties for noncompliance. CTOs and CIOs must prioritize understanding the Act’s implications to navigate innovation and ensure compliance effectively.
The article discusses the ethical challenges posed by AI technology, emphasizing the need for proactive governance to address both technical and behavioral concerns. It highlights the importance of building trust through responsible AI development while navigating the evolving landscape of regulations and public perceptions.
The post discusses the challenges businesses face in protecting trade secrets while complying with new AI transparency regulations. It offers strategic recommendations for balancing the need for transparency with the preservation of valuable intellectual property.
As the financial sector advances its AI initiatives, banks have significantly increased their hiring of governance and ethical use professionals, with 41 out of 50 large banks now employing dedicated AI governance staff. Research indicates that responsible AI practices are becoming integral to banking operations, with leading institutions conducting in-house studies to inform their adoption strategies.
This article explores the critical role of Explainable AI (XAI) in ensuring transparency and accountability in high-stakes environments, such as healthcare and public safety. It emphasizes that XAI is essential not only for technical performance but also for bridging the gap between ethical responsibility and AI deployment.
A newly proposed California bill, Assembly Bill 1018, aims to regulate artificial intelligence decision-making tools to prevent discrimination in the workplace. If passed, it would impose significant compliance burdens on employers using AI-driven hiring and workforce management tools.
Eighty-seven percent of managers recognize the significance of responsible AI (RAI), yet only 15% feel adequately prepared to implement RAI practices. This gap indicates a disconnect between the acknowledgment of ethical AI principles and the actual adoption of responsible AI programs within organizations.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
