The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act categorizes AI systems based on their risk levels, prohibiting high-risk systems and imposing strict regulations on those deemed high-risk. The legislation aims to ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed safely while addressing potential harms to individuals and society.
The European Union’s AI Act, the world’s first law regulating artificial intelligence, requires AI companies to notify rightsholders when their works are used for training algorithms. As tech giants like OpenAI push back against these transparency obligations, creatives demand compensation for the use of their content.
AI-washing is a deceptive marketing tactic where companies exaggerate the role of AI in promoting their products or services, potentially misleading consumers. As AI becomes more integrated into the nutrition space, it is essential for regulators and consumers to approach AI-powered solutions with caution.
The AI Act, published by the EU, establishes the world’s first comprehensive legal framework governing artificial intelligence, requiring businesses to identify and categorize their AI systems for compliance. It outlines various obligations for stakeholders, including providers and deployers, based on the risk level associated with their AI applications.
As the EU’s AI Act comes into full force in 2026, businesses globally will face challenges due to the lack of standardisation in AI regulation, creating compliance uncertainty. Implementing AI guardrails is essential for companies to navigate these risks while ensuring their AI applications are secure and aligned with ethical standards.
Arkansas has enacted HB1071, a law aimed at protecting individuals from unauthorized AI-generated likenesses for commercial use, requiring explicit consent for such replication. This legislation expands existing publicity rights protections to include AI-generated images and voices, providing individuals with legal recourse against unauthorized use.
The EU AI Act is regarded as the most comprehensive set of regulations for artificial intelligence, yet it lacks specific implementation details. Currently, tech giants are pushing back against the Act, with concerns that it may be weakened due to their influence.
The ongoing public hearing in Hartford focuses on the need for regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in Connecticut, emphasizing the potential risks of unchecked technology. Supporters argue that timely regulation is essential to protect consumers and workers, while critics warn it may stifle innovation.
The essay discusses the need for inclusive AI practices and the importance of reviewing evidence from diverse public voices to ensure that marginalized groups are represented in AI decision-making. It emphasizes that current AI assurance frameworks are inadequate and calls for a re-evaluation of how evidence is gathered and utilized in the AI field.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
