Day: January 16, 2025

AI Regulation: What Employers Need to Know for 2025

As AI technology continues to evolve, various legislative efforts are underway in the U.S., U.K., and E.U. to regulate its use in the workplace. Employers must stay informed about current and anticipated legal developments to ensure compliance and adapt to the changing landscape.

Read More »

Urgent Revisions Needed for EU’s GPAI Code to Prevent Legislative Backslide

The European Commission’s AI Office has published a second draft of the Code of Practice for general-purpose AI, which includes measures previously rejected during the AI Act negotiations. CCIA Europe warns that if left unaddressed, the drafting process could undermine the legislative integrity of the AI Act and jeopardize the interests of AI developers and innovators.

Read More »

Preparing for AI Regulation: What Organizations Need to Know in 2025

Over the next 12-18 months, organizations will face an increasingly complex landscape of AI compliance frameworks and regulations as governments worldwide advance legislation to address AI risks. The EU AI Act, set to begin its rollout in February 2025, will require organizations to ensure their employees possess adequate AI literacy and comply with strict regulations on high-risk AI applications.

Read More »

Revolutionizing AI Compliance with Daiki’s New Registry

DAIKI GmbH has launched its AI Registry to help companies manage their AI systems and ensure compliance with regulations like the EU AI Act. This innovative tool offers a comprehensive overview of AI risk and compliance, enabling organizations to track and document their AI deployments effectively.

Read More »

The Dangers of Rigid AI Regulation

The article discusses the potential downsides of risk-based AI regulation, highlighting how such approaches may stifle innovation and fail to address the complexities of rapidly evolving AI technologies. It contrasts risk-based regulation with a rights-based approach, arguing that the latter could provide a more effective framework for protecting human rights in the face of AI advancements.

Read More »

Shaping AI Governance: The Impact of the EU AI Act

The European Union’s AI Act, which took effect on August 1, 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive regulation for artificial intelligence, implementing a risk-based framework to ensure technology aligns with societal values. This legislation not only imposes strict measures on high-risk AI systems but also bans unacceptable practices, such as social scoring and police profiling, potentially influencing global AI governance standards.

Read More »

Understanding the EU’s AI Act: Implications for 2025 and Beyond

The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act, scheduled for implementation in 2025, defines an AI system as a machine-based system capable of operating with varying levels of autonomy and adaptiveness. As industries prepare for compliance, the Act aims to promote ethical AI development while addressing concerns about AI bias and discrimination.

Read More »

Enforcing the AI Act: Key to Global Standards

Scholars are urging the European Union to prioritize the enforcement of the recently passed Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) to ensure it becomes a global benchmark for proactive AI regulation. They highlight concerns about the adequacy of resources and expertise at the newly created AI Office, which is essential for effective enforcement and maintaining equitable standards across member states.

Read More »

EU AI Act: Essential Compliance Strategies for SMBs

The EU AI Act, published on July 12, 2024, introduces significant regulations impacting how small and medium businesses operate with AI systems in the EU. It outlines extensive documentation requirements and expands liability risks, necessitating compliance to avoid substantial penalties.

Read More »

Addressing Normative Imbalances in the Artificial Intelligence Act

The Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA), approved by the European Council, aims to ensure a high level of protection against the harmful effects of AI systems while promoting innovation in the EU. However, there are concerns that the rule-based approach may not adequately balance fundamental rights and innovation, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes.

Read More »